July
4, 2010
OUT OF NOTHING
Scripture
– I Corinthians 1:20-31
There were 700 of them marching to
Concord, Massachusetts – confident, experienced, tough, disciplined. They were British soldiers and they belonged
to an army which was considered virtually invincible in that day and age. It was early dawn on April 19 in 1775, and
these men were under secret orders from the crown to find and destroy a cache
of weapons which were believed to be hidden somewhere in or around the town to
which they were heading.
The colonies were in turmoil…and the
most virulent and antagonistic troublemakers (certainly from a British
perspective) lived in Massachusetts. The
leaders there, particularly in Boston, made no bones about the fact that they
were fed up with the arrogance of a country and a king which treated them, at
best, like second class citizens, and, at worst, like servants or slaves. The colonists paid taxes, but had little or
no say in the amount or the usage of those taxes. The colonists were skilled craftsmen, but
were primarily allowed to only supply raw materials to the merchants and
artisans in Britain and then forced to buy, from them, the finished
products. The colonists wanted to
increase their prosperity through trade, but were required to trade almost
exclusively with the “mother country”.
The colonists were English, but certainly did not enjoy all the powers and
privileges of their fellow countrymen “back home”. To say that they were angry and agitated
would be an understatement…and some of them were beginning to advocate violence
as a solution to their problems.
So, to prevent that from happening,
the British soldiers were on their way to nip any thoughts of revolution in the
bud by making sure the colonists had nothing to fight with. But patriot intelligence had uncovered the
English intent…so they moved all their supplies and arms to new storage, and
many positioned themselves for a standoff with the unwelcome “Red Coats”. This was the colonists’ way of saying no more to the high-handed and
strong-arm tactics of England. They felt
the British government had gone too far too often, and it was time to fight
back. In a very real sense, this America
was the original “mouse that roared”!
This episode on the road from Lexington
to Concord became known as: The shot heard ‘round the world. However, no one has the faintest idea who (or
even which side) first pulled the trigger.
Either way…the whole thing only lasted a few minutes and we got
clobbered. This skirmish, which featured
a noisy exchange of verbal threats and a noisier exchange of musket fire, ended
when the British troops charged, killing or wounding a quarter of the American
militiamen and thereby routing the rest, who broke and ran. It should be noted that the British suffered
only one minor injury…and any impartial (or even partial) assessment of the
event would indicate that on that day, victory was dressed in red. By the English, the battle was considered
little more than a quick and painless drill.
But for the colonists, the Revolutionary War had begun!
Never did a people face longer
odds. Britain was the strongest economic
power on the planet, and possessed the most formidable navy and most powerful
army. Going up against that was a
rag-tag would-be nation without (at the beginning) army or navy or organized
defense. Also missing was historical
precedent – no colony had ever, up to that time, successfully broken away from
a mother country to produce an independent nation. It would have been a bit like Montana
declaring its independence from the United States and then militarily waging
and winning a war. Impossible –
right? But that’s exactly what happened.
We can only ask…how? Perhaps we could reverse
an old saying to produce the concept of “right makes might” – that would
certainly be the way the situation was viewed by the Americans doing the
revolting. And there was an eclectic
band of makeshift leaders on the colonial side which had a hand in the ultimate
American success. Certainly some of the
soon-to-be historical icons entered the war with reputations, although those
reputations might have had nothing to do with “nation building”…but most did
not have even that – they were simply “average Joes” from next door. Samuel Adams, the Boston firebrand and
rabble-rouser, was a tax collector…and a fairly slovenly and undisciplined
figure who would not have engendered a whole lot of confidence in most
situations. Patrick Henry was a bartender who, for all we know, might have been
under the influence of one of his own libations when he declared: Give me
liberty, or give me death. George
Washington was a planter and surveyor whose most successful “business” move was
marrying a rich widow and whose military “claim to fame” was having served with
General Braddock when he was ambushed and killed during the French and Indian
Wars. Nathan Hale, who did, indeed, give
his one and only life for his country, was a poet and teacher. Thomas Paine, whose writings so inflamed and
inspired the revolutionary cause, offered a resume which included pastoring a
Methodist church, teaching school, and corset making…none of which he was very
good at. All these men were pretty
nondescript…especially when compared to what they eventually did and became.
One who would have certainly fit
that description was Paul Revere – the local coroner and silversmith. Talk about “reaching the heights” when
necessary. He made his famous midnight
ride while unarmed and by breaking through numerous roadblocks. Once captured, the British beat him, stole
his exhausted horse, and interrogated him on the whereabouts of Samuel Adams
and John Hancock. They finally released
him because, they reasoned, since he was dressed as a gentleman he probably did
not pose a serious threat or apparent danger.
As soon as he was freed, Revere ran through the woods to warn Hancock
and Adams…and led them to safety.
Most of the Sons of Liberty were apparently
unremarkable people who accomplished extraordinary things, often by doing
ordinary things. They waved bright
lanterns while riding from place to place on horseback; they beat drums on
their farms or ran through towns blowing horns; they set signal fires and fired
shots…all to warn others when and if the enemy was advancing. And most of those who rose to the top in
terms of leadership, were not trained in the arts of war or governance and came
from the unexpected. It has been observed
that sunken treasures, once completely out of sight and stuck to the bottom,
bob to the top in stormy weather. That’s
what happened here. Those who led the
revolutionary forces discovered strengths and talents within themselves which
most never imagined they possessed. They
had no credentials but they did the job.
How? Why? Partly because they believed their cause was
just and they were willing to risk all they were and had to attain their goal –
in this case, freedom.
Seemingly ordinary people doing sometimes
ordinary and sometimes extraordinary things leading to rather incredible
results. The Bible is full of stories of
such individuals. Joshua was just
another member of a group of Israelites who wandered from Egypt to Canaan in
search of freedom and identity after escaping from centuries of the oppression
of slavery, but he inherited the leadership role from Moses and managed to take
his people to a place where they could establish a homeland. Gideon was the son of a farmer and vintner,
self-described as being the least member of a family which was part of the
smallest clan in Manasseh, who was commissioned to lead the Hebrews in battle
against their Midianite enemies…and succeeded with only three hundred men. Amos was a shepherd in the “boonies” of Tekoa
who, believing he was called to prophecy in the name of Yahweh, cried out
against the injustices he found in his world by attacking the perpetrators of
those injustices – the rich and powerful who cared about no one but themselves. Nehemiah, serving as cupbearer to the king of
the Persians, got himself appointed as governor of Judea and returned to the
homeland of his ancestors to rebuild Jerusalem and restore civil and political
order there.
Now, this kind of activity was not
restricted to the men of the Bible.
Numerous women filled similar roles in accomplishing the
remarkable. Deborah was one of the
judges of Israel in the days before it acquired nationhood and she led her
countrymen to victory over their enemies when such an achievement seemed
impossible. Abigail was a farmer’s wife
who persuaded David to avoid making the mistake of deservedly killing her
husband, an act which would have had serious and negative consequences for him,
and later became his queen on his way to assuming the throne of Israel. Esther was a woman with apparently nothing to
set her apart besides her beauty, and yet she saved the Hebrews from
annihilation through great courage and quick wits.
None of these biblical heroes and
heroines, like so many of the leaders of the colonies before and during the
Revolutionary War, had credentials to support the roles they were to assume or
the goals they were to reach, but what they did have were worthwhile causes to
get them started and keep them going.
They were pragmatic, they were dedicated, they were fearless, and they
discovered within themselves talents and abilities which only came to the fore
when they were required. Ron Walters has
written that: The size of the cause will always determine the risk…and define the
risk taker. So it is that the
scriptures, as well as the accounts of the events of the Revolutionary War, are
filled with the small who slew giants, the meek who somehow “called down fire
from heaven”, the “barren” who produced nations, and the powerless who
led. We must never forget that even
Jesus, the carpenter, was later symbolized by a lowly lamb, and that his
closest associates were fishermen and tax collectors and farmers.
The specialty of the divine has
always been, as stated in 1 Corinthians, to use…what is foolish in the world to shame the wise…and…what is weak in the world to shame the
strong. Into which of those
categories would you place yourself, and do you have any idea what you can
accomplish if the cause for which you fight is right?
There are certainly enough causes in
our world for which it would be right to fight.
And whether we fight for them as Christians or as Americans, they should
be the same causes. I am talking about
justice. I am talking about
freedom. I am talking about
compassion. I am talking about
equality. I am talking about
conservation. I am talking about love. These are qualities espoused by our faith and
by our nation, but they are not qualities always demonstrated in either. Despite all the good found in both our
religion and our country, we have used our religious beliefs to denigrate
others and we have used our national power to control others. Perhaps as we sit here this morning in
church, on Independence Day, we can recommit ourselves to the implementation of
the principles upon which our faith and our nation are founded. Both, faith and nation, are, and must be,
works in progress. Well, who is to see
that this work progresses? Who else, at
this point, but us?
Both our religion and our country
seem, in some ways, to have been born out of nothing. But that is not true. They came about because of the something in
the people who got them going and made them what they are. Now the torch has been passed to us. We’ve been chosen to champion the causes
which are right and necessary. Are we up
to the task? History may or may not
record our individual legacies. But what
we do and who we are will have an impact nonetheless. Let us not be found wanting!
By: Herb
Freitag