June
20, 2010
OF FATHERS AND SONS
Scripture
– Proverbs 2:1-15; 1 Samuel 31:1-7
The Bible, particularly the Old
Testament, deals frequently with families.
And many of the accounts concern fathers and sons. Now, I am not ignoring the girls in this
sermon, but I will articulate a recognition that there is special bonding
between fathers and sons just as there is between mothers and daughters…certainly
in the sense that youngsters learn from members of the same sex things that
will help them determine their roles and assume their places later in
life. Is there overlapping? Of course. But for the purposes of this Father’s Day
message, I would like to kind of emphasize what is passed down from male to
male and from generation to generation.
With that said, let’s return to the
Old Testament. The Hebrew Scriptures are
filled with accounts of dysfunctional families…and most of the fathers are
anything but admirable. Think about some
of them. Abraham had confrontations with
his nephew, Lot; strong as he was in other matters, when it came to his wife,
Sarah, he was a wuss; he sent his son Ishmael to certainly suffer and perhaps
die in the wilderness when his second son, Isaac, came along and Sarah was
jealous of any potential rivalry for Abraham’s affections. Isaac so favored one son, Jacob, over another
son, Esau, that he let the younger “steal” the birthright of the older as well
as the traditional paternal blessing.
Jacob’s exorbitantly preferential treatment of Joseph led to the boy’s
enslavement by his own brothers when they could no longer stand Joseph’s
flaunting of the evidence of his father’s love and patronage. So we find that the three major patriarchs of
Israel were “messed up” when it came to the raising of their male children. Indeed, in the entire book of Genesis there
only seems to be one father who apparently got along well with his sons –
Noah. After all, they helped him with
the “ark project” when it seemed the most ridiculous thing in the world…and
they were still speaking and cooperating after the flood ended and the waters subsided. Although, even here, we have Noah cursing one
of them because Ham accidentally came upon his father, on one occasion, drunk
and naked…and Noah was embarrassed.
After Genesis, there’s little talk of fathers and sons until we come to
the accounts featuring Saul and David…and there we have a real comparison.
Saul was a lousy king and a great
father. David was a great king and a lousy
father. There you have it in a nutshell. Saul made mistake after mistake during his
reign as Israel’s ruler, and ultimately Samuel, the prophet who had anointed
him king in the first place, withdrew his support and anointed David as Saul’s
successor. But despite his flaws and
failings in the governing “department”, and despite his frequent rages while
suffering bouts of depression, Saul was always loved and admired by his sons
who, as our scripture reading reveals, followed him to the very end. Conversely, David was a great king who really
put Israel on the map while defeating its enemies and expanding its borders;
while increasing its wealth and solidifying its influence. Indeed, he was a born politician and
statesman. But he was also the head of a
very dysfunctional and violent family. One
son, Amnon, raped his stepsister, Tamar, and was subsequently murdered by her
brother, Absalom, Amnon’s stepbrother. This
son, Absalom, later led a rebellion against David in an attempt to usurp the
throne, and, after losing in battle, was killed by Joab. Then, as David was coming to the end of his
life, two sons, Solomon and Adonijah, jockeyed for position as his replacement
and, sometime after Solomon won, Adonijah was executed at the direction of his
stepbrother – the new king.
Because these biblical accounts are
relatively short on detail, presenting more “bones” than “flesh”, it’s hard to
see where Saul went right and David went wrong in the raising of their children. Nonetheless, the “proof is in the pudding”
and the results pretty much speak for themselves. One thing we might point to is the example
set by the fathers for their sons to emulate.
Saul, despite his occasional psychological difficulties, held his sons
close to him in good relationships and showed them that they must strive to do
their best, even if their best might not always be good enough. David, as the episode with Bathsheba
demonstrates, sometimes seemed to send the message that one can and should do
anything necessary to obtain what he wants…a message apparently not lost on the
likes of Amnon and Absalom, of Adonijah and Solomon – four men who did just
that.
There are many ways we teach others,
particularly those close to us. We can
teach with words, we can teach with deeds, and sometimes (perhaps most of the
time) we use a combination. And let’s
not forget that we can also change, making right that which was wrong. At this point, then, I want to share with you
two stories which support the theme I have been articulating.
First
story
In
the early days of the twentieth century, Al Capone practically owned
Chicago. You have all heard of Al Capone…and
not because he was any kind of hero.
Capone was notorious for the crimes he committed as he and his gang
enmeshed the “Windy City” in every sleazy thing from prostitution to bootlegged
booze to murder. Capone had a lawyer
nicknamed “Easy Eddie” – a very clever man who, through adept legal
maneuvering, kept the mob boss out of prison for a long time. In return, Capone compensated his
“mouthpiece” very well, not only with big money but also with expensive
perks. For example, Eddie and his family
resided in a fence-enclosed mansion with live-in servants and all of the
conveniences of the day. In fact, the
estate was so large that it covered an entire city block.
So, while Eddie lived the high life,
courtesy of the mob, he gave little thought to the atrocities going on around
him. But he had one soft spot in his
heart – his son, whom he loved dearly.
Indeed, Eddie saw to it that the young man had every advantage – good
clothes, good education, good cars.
Nothing was ever withheld; price was no object. And, despite his involvement with organized
crime, Eddie did try to teach his son right from wrong – he wanted him to be a
better man than he was. But, with all
his wealth and influence, there were two things which, under the present
circumstances, he could not pass on – a good name or a good example.
One day, because of this, Easy Eddie
made a difficult decision. He decided to
rectify the wrongs he had done and the mistakes he had made. He determined that he would go to the
authorities and tell them the truth about “Scarface” Al Capone…thereby clearing
up his name and perhaps presenting to his son some semblance of integrity and
honor. He would testify against Capone,
knowing that the cost might be great.
Testify he did. Within a year, Easy Eddie died in a blaze of
gunfire on a lonely Chicago street. But
he had given his son the greatest gift he had to offer at the greatest price he
could ever pay. Police removed from his
pockets a rosary, a crucifix, a religious medallion, and a poem clipped from a
magazine, which declared:
The clock of life is wound but once,
And
no man has the power to tell
Just
when the hands will stop at late or early hour.
Now
is the only time you own.
Live,
love, toil with a will.
Place
no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still.
Second
story
World War 2 produced many
heroes. One of them was Lieutenant
Commander Butch O’Hare. He was a fighter
pilot assigned to the aircraft carrier, Lexington, and stationed in the South
Pacific. One day he was sent on a
mission with his entire squadron. After
he was airborne for a period of time, he realized that someone had forgotten to
top off his fuel tank and that he would not have enough fuel to complete his
mission and get back to his ship. His
flight leader told him to return to the carrier. Reluctantly he dropped out of formation and
headed back to the fleet.
As he was approaching the Lexington
he saw something that turned his blood cold – a group of Japanese aircraft
speeding on their way toward the American ships. Because all the American planes were gone on
a sortie, the fleet was virtually defenseless.
He could not reach his squadron and bring them back in time, nor could
he warn the fleet of the approaching danger.
There was only one thing to do – he must somehow divert the enemy.
Laying aside all thought for
personal safety, O’Hare dove into the Japanese formation. Wing-mounted 50 caliber guns blazed as he
charged, attacking one surprised plane after another. He wove in and out, firing at as many of the
opposing aircraft as possible before he ran out of ammunition. Undaunted, he continued his assault, trying
to clip their wings or tails in order to render them unfit to fly.
The
exasperated Japanese squadron finally took off in another direction. Deeply relieved, Butch O’Hare and his tattered
fighter limped back to the carrier. Upon
his arrival, he reported in and related the events surrounding his return. The film from the camera mounted on his plane
told the tale. It showed the extent of
O’Hare’s daring in his attempt to protect his fleet. He had, in fact, destroyed five enemy
aircraft. The date was February 20,
1942, and for his action, Butch O’Hare became the navy’s first World War 2
“Ace” and the first naval aviator to win the Congressional Medal of Honor! Tragically, a year later he was killed in
aerial combat at the age of 29.
His
hometown would not let his memory fade, and today O’Hare Airport in Chicago is
named in tribute to the courage of this native son. If you ever fly through there and have a
chance to look around, you might consider visiting his memorial which displays
his statue and his Medal of Honor – it’s located between terminals 1 and 2.
Connection
So what do these two stories have to
do with one another? I am sure you have
guessed the answer: Butch O’Hare was the
son of Easy Eddie! It seems the father’s
sacrifice had a positive effect.
This morning I’ve been primarily
talking about fathers and son. The same
lessons would apply to mothers and daughters, to mothers and sons, to fathers
and daughters, to adults and children.
One generation learns from preceding generations and, in turn, teaches
the next generations. And this is most
beneficially and effectively done by example.
There is a great deal of truth to the axiom: Do as I
do, not as I say.
I guess, then, that each of us ought
to be constantly considering what example we set for the young people in our
lives. King Saul did a pretty good job:
King David was not so hot. How about
you? How about me? Nobody expects us to be perfect…but we are
expected to try to be better. And we can
always change. Look at Easy Eddie. This is important. Much of the future might depend upon what we
do in the here and now.
By: Herb Freitag